L i n k s :
Click here to subscribe to our free monthly electronic newsletter on organic farming
|
Traditional agriculture in India : High yields and no waste continued,
part 2 of 2 Look for the links to related pages on this website at the end. Hume's
tribute to the grain-storage practices of Indian farmers is no less
glowing. "They are great adepts in storing grain, and will turn out
of rough earthen pits, after 20 years, absolutely uninjured. They know the
exact state of ripeness to which grain should be allowed to stand in
different seasons; in other words under different meteorological
conditions, to ensure its keeping when thus stored; and equally the length
of time that, under varying atmospheric conditions, it should lie upon the
open threshing floor to secure the same object."
All
these statements were made in the latter part of the 19th century, but
more recent research on tribal communities and other farmers following
traditional methods of cultivation has also revealed several interesting
facts about the assets of traditional agriculture. Research
work done during the last decade by a prominent agricultural scientist of
India, Dr R.H. Richharia (former Director of
Central Rice Research Institute in India) in the Chhatisgarh region of the
state of Madhya Pradesh has revealed the high level of skills of the
farmers of remote tribal villages still untouched by the official
development programmes. This scientist's travels in Bastar district, one
of the most remote areas in Central India, where tribal communities still
lead a life of their own, brought him into contact with farmers who were
taking comparable and even larger yields from indigenous rice varieties,
compared to the HYVs being spread officially in other parts of the state.
Another revelation was the very large number of rice varieties being grown
by the farmers, who possessed detailed knowledge of each of their
properties. Some of those varieties were remarkable for their high yields,
some for their supreme cooking qualities, some for their aroma, and some
for other cherished qualities. In
the late seventies, Dr Richharia wrote :
"A recent varietal cum agronomic survey has shown that nearly 9 per
cent of the total varieties grown in MP fall under the category of high
yielding types (3,705 kgs and above per hectare). A
farmer planting a rice variety called Mokdo of Bastar who adopted his own
cultivation practices obtained about 3,700 to 4,700 kgs of paddy per
hectare. Another rice grower of Dhamtari block (Raipur) with just one
hectare of rice land, told me that he obtained about 4,400 kgs of paddy
per hectare from chinnar variety, a renowned scented type, year after year
with little fluctuations. He used farmyard manure supplemented at times
with a low dose of nitrogen fertilisers. For low lying areas in Farasgaon
Block (Bastar) a non-lodging mildly scented tall rice variety Surja with
bold grains can compete with Java in yield potential at lower doses of
fertilisation, according to a local grower who recently showed me his
crop. During my visit to the Bastar area in the middle of November, 1975,
when the harvesting of new rice crop was in full swing in that locality, I
observed a field of Assam Chudi ready for harvest with which the adivasi
cultivator named Baldeo of the Bhatra tribe in the village Dhikonga
Jugalpur block, had entered in a crop competition. The cultivator had
applied fertiliser approximately equal 50 kg N/ha and had used no plant
protection measure. He expected a yield of about 5,000 kg/ha. In
the Bichia Block of the Mandla district, Madhya Pradesh, our survey
(1973-74) has indicated the following yields : Indigenous rice
variety
Yield in bags/acre (1 bag = 75 kgs)
Yield in kg/ha
Amar Jyoti 20 3,750
Rani Kajar 30-35 5,625-6,562
Chattri 20 3,750
Dubraj 20-25 3750-4,687
Luchari 30-35 5,625-6,562 Dr
Richharia stresses that the existing local practice of cultivation
have emerged after centuries of experience, based on trial and error and
have a sound base for their wide acceptance. While
studying traditional agriculture, attention should not be focused only, or
even primarily, on farming methods and on crop varieties. What is more
important is the overall harmony of the traditional mixed farming system. Traditionally,
man, animals, trees (including grass lands) and agricultural fields were
inseparable and harmonious components of a single system. The villager
looked after the trees on his fields and also contributed to the
maintenance of the community grazing land. He looked after the animals
owned by him, sometimes with the assistance of a grazing hand and
cultivated the fields owned by him, with or without hired labour or share
croppers. The
trees provided fodder for the cattle. They also provided fuel for the
villagers. The leaves that fell were put to uses beneficial to the
agricultural fields. Meanwhile their soil and water conservation
properties were beneficial for the villagers and contributed to
maintaining the fertility of agricultural fields, as well providing shade
during the scorching summer, addition, certain trees provided edible
fruits medicines, gum, toothpaste and a host of other commodities of every
day use. In some villages trees were used for lac cultivation, and for
raising silkworms and bees. Owing to their water conservation properties
trees were also responsible in several villages for ensuring an adequate
supply of drinking water. Cattle
provided milk and milk products and contributed to the nutritional content
of the villagers' diet. Cattle dung provided organic fertilisers for the
fields, while the poultry provided eggs and meat. The skins of dead cattle
were used for making footwear and other leather products—all such
activity being carried out in the village. Not least, bullocks ploughed
the fields. The
fields produced foodgrains, pulses, oilseeds and vegetables for the
villagers. The residues of those crops, of no direct use to man who could
not eat them, were fed to the cattle. Poultry birds scavenged the wasted
scattered grain. Harmonious
as the system was, disturbing a single component could have a chain effect
of far-reaching consequences. For instance, if for some reason the
villagers did not properly look after the community grazing lands and
trees or if these were destroyed by some outside force, say a timber
merchant, then soil and water conservation would inevitably suffer. The
fertility of the agricultural fields would not only be directly affected
by also indirectly, because shortage of timber would mean that more dung
would have to be used as fuel, thereby leaving less for fertilising the
fields. The next consequence would be shortage of fodder, leading to a
weakening of the animals. In addition, the villagers would be gradually
deprived of several commodities of everyday use, including fruits and
medicines. Over
much of India, the traditional harmonious mixed farming system has been
disrupted. Thus around most villages the land is eroded, agricultural
yields are low, there is shortage of fuel and fodder the bullocks are
weak, and the milk yield is low. Under
such conditions it is vital that a massive tree planting programme in and
around the village should be undertaken and the grazing lands be
rehabilitated. Not only will such activities put agriculture and animal
husbandry back on their feet, they will also help solve the problem of
fuel shortage and help improve the drinking water situation. Furthermore
planners should study the numerous varieties of crops being grown in those
areas, and should then make good quality seeds available to the villagers.
Better field preparation and help with manuring, sowing operations, crop
management and with post harvest storage will lead to better quality of
crops as well as yields. All this can be done within the framework of the
traditional system, that is, maintaining the essential harmony of
agriculture, animal husbandry and forestry. Any
effort to rebuild or improve the traditional system of mixed farming must
be done in a manner in which there is no conflict between agriculture,
forestry, animal husbandry and the real needs of the village. It is all
too easy to go against the essence of the traditional system—for
instance, through planting tree species which while meeting the
requirements of industry do not provide fodder to the villagers nor
increase the fertility of the fields. Furthermore, breeds of cattle can be
promoted which cannot thrive on crop residues but must be fed on
foodgrains that before were consumed only by human beings. Thus
some varieties of pine and eucalyptus, both of which are being promoted in
the government's tree planting programmes, have leaves that cannot be
consumed as fodder, while their acidic properties diminish the fertility
of agricultural land as well as lowering its moisture content. Moreover
with certain breeds of cow that have been introduced, it becomes necessary
to use village land for growing green fodder as well as coarse cereals in
order to feed the cattle, thereby diminishing the availability of food in
the village, even though milk production is expected to rise. Within the
traditional system, milk production does not rise at the expense of losing
food grains since cattle are expected to consume only green tree leaves
and crop residues. Moreover, the benefits of cross-bred cows and of higher
milk production are likely to accrue at least initially to the better off
villages, while the effect of decreased food production will probably be
felt by the poorer sections of the community. New
agricultural technology in the form of tractors and fertilisers will again
benefit the richer farmers, who will therefore be able to increase their
agricultural production and cash receipts. On the other hand, their
dependence on organic manure and bullocks is reduced, so that their
requirement for fodder becomes less. All those factors may lead them to
neglect the growth and proper maintenance of grazing lands. In fact, owing
to the high value of any additional land, they may even be tempted to
encroach grazing land and grow crops on it, using tractors and chemical
fertilisers. In the process the rest of the village becomes worse off than
before. In
recent years ambitious programmes of agriculture, dairy development and
forestry have been undertaken and even more ambitious programmes will be
undertaken in the near future. In view of the massive investments being
made, the development planners should pause to think about the merits of
the traditional system of the Indian village and the way in which the
villagers made the best use of available resources with minimal wastage. What
Voelcker wrote nearly 100 years back may be valid today also: "I
believe that it will be possible here and there to graft onto native
practice the results of the western experience, but the main advance will
come from an enquiry into native agriculture, and from the extension of
the better indigenous methods to parts where they are not known or
employed." Source : The
Ecologist, Vol.13, No. 2/3, 1983 Pages
on this website relevant to chemical agriculture, the need for organic
farming, traditional agriculture and related issues : 18
ways how "modern" farming affects our world
Natural
farming succeeds in Indian village
Hunger,
and why technology cannot feed the world Indian
farmers rediscover advantages of traditional rice varieties You
may also like to read on this website :
Myths
and fallacies about organic farming
Techniques
and practices in organic farming
On
the
effects of pesticides : Pesticides
in your food (and water)
For
general information on organic farming,
click here
For
information
on other issues related to organic farming,
click here
To order satavic.org on CD, click here Copyright © 1999-2010 by Satavic Farms. All rights reserved. Disclaimer |